<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voices for America&#039;s Children - nonprofit, nonpartisan advocacy for better child policy &#187; Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voices.org/category/issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voices.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Children require greater essential health benefits through health reform</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/children-require-greater-essential-health-benefits-through-aca/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/children-require-greater-essential-health-benefits-through-aca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MatthewWright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children’s Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPSDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essential health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Beginning in 2014, typical health insurance plans must cover certain services and benefits to customers &#8212; a victory for children and families won through health care reform. Today Voices for America’s Children responded to the U.S. Department of Health and Human&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning in 2014, typical health insurance plans must cover certain services and benefits to customers &#8212; a victory for children and families won through health care reform. Today Voices for America’s Children responded to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) “Essential Health Benefits Bulletin.” HHS issued the bulletin last month in order to define &#8220;Essential Health Benefits&#8221; for implementation of the Affordable Care Act and the new health insurance exchanges.  Check out our comments <a href="http://voices.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/EHB-comments-to-HHS-Voices-for-Americas-Children.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>Ensuring a robust and comprehensive Essential Health Benefits (EHB) package is critically important for children, especially those who are lower-income and/or have special health care needs.  HHS must aggressively define the EHB package for children and cannot rely on the sufficiency of the existing benchmark options outlined in the bulletin. This is especially relevant to the pediatric services outlined in the bulletin, such as oral and vision care.</p>
<p><span id="more-5711"></span></p>
<p>Voices recommended the following regulatory approaches:</p>
<ul>
<li>HHS should take a prescriptive, rather than flexible, approach in setting the standard for children’s health care.</li>
<li>Valuable state mandates securing access to critical services for children should be included in the EHB definition.</li>
<li>Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services must clarify its regulations on the Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program dental benefit as required by its renewal legislation in 2009.</li>
<li>It is important to provide detailed regulatory guidance to states on the design of the pediatric dental benefit.</li>
<li>Ensure that the Exchange regulations provide consumers equitable affordability of oral health benefits, regardless of issuer.</li>
<li>HHS should allow and encourage states to provide cost‐effective risk‐based pediatric dental benefits.</li>
<li>Medicaid’s pediatric standard of coverage, <a href="http://mchb.hrsa.gov/epsdt/">EPSDT</a>, should serve as the model for the scope and breadth of EHBs for children, including vision/oral care.  This includes EPSDT’s broader medical necessity definition, which is critical to ensuring healthy childhood development.</li>
<li>The outlined approach regarding potential benchmarks for pediatric oral and vision care should be strengthened, so that states have the option of using the children’s Medicaid benefit as a benchmark.</li>
</ul>
<p>We look forward to working with HHS to implement these recommendations, in order to ensure all children receive quality health care coverage and access as a result of the Affordable Care Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/children-require-greater-essential-health-benefits-through-aca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sec. of Education: No Child Left Behind &#8220;still has flaws that need to be fixed&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/sec-of-education-no-child-left-behind-still-has-flaws-that-need-to-be-fixed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/sec-of-education-no-child-left-behind-still-has-flaws-that-need-to-be-fixed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terrylynn Tyrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Care & Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arne Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary and secondary education act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no child left behind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The controversial No Child Left Behind education law made progress toward school reform but has its own flaws that must be fixed, according to the U.S. secretary of education. Secretary Arne Duncan credits the law with exposing achievement gaps among&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The controversial No Child Left Behind education law made progress toward school reform but has its own flaws that must be fixed, according to the U.S. secretary of education. Secretary Arne Duncan credits the law with exposing achievement gaps among American students, but its focus on testing has often proved counterproductive. Duncan describes schools that have lowered their standards simply to avoid federal penalties and shrunk curriculum to comply with a new emphasis on standardized testing.</p>
<p><a href="http://georgiavoices.org/"><img style="padding: 10px; float: right; width: 150px;" src="http://voices.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/GA-member.jpg" alt="" /></a> The prospects for new education legislation during the election year are dim. But the policy discussions have been simmering around the country lately, <a href="http://www.voices.org/blog/voices-members-hold-town-hall-meetings-in-13-states/">including Voices&#8217; own series of town hall meetings</a>. Voices member Voices for Georgia&#8217;s Children has just told us of two meetings it has scheduled with Georgia&#8217;s members of Congress, which will include presentations with school workers, early education experts and more. They&#8217;re excited about the possibilities and so is Voices! <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Voices-for-Georgias-Children/302336780324">Befriend Voices for Georgia&#8217;s Children on Facebook for updates on their work</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/sec-of-education-no-child-left-behind-still-has-flaws-that-need-to-be-fixed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An oral health win for kids in West Virginia!</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/an-oral-health-win-for-kids-in-west-virginia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/an-oral-health-win-for-kids-in-west-virginia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Asha Sutton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children’s Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluoride varnish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid reimbursement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia KIDS COUNT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Good news for children in West Virginia: they’ll soon have greater access to oral health services. Due to the great work of Voices member <a href="http://www.wvkidscount.org/">West Virginia KIDS COUNT</a> and its partners, that state will now encourage fluoride varnish treatment,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for children in West Virginia: they’ll soon have greater access to oral health services. Due to the great work of Voices member <a href="http://www.wvkidscount.org/">West Virginia KIDS COUNT</a> and its partners, that state will now encourage fluoride varnish treatment, which will help protect the vulnerable teeth of young children.<br />
<a href="http://www.wvkidscount.org/"><img src="http://voices.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/wv.jpg" style="padding: 10px; float: right; width: 150px;"/></a></p>
<p>Kids between the ages of six months and three years who are at high risk of dental cavities will be able to have primary care providers administer fluoride varnish treatments to protect their teeth from decay. Primary care providers who have been certified through the West Virginia University School of Dentistry will be eligible for reimbursement from the state Bureau of Medical Services. On behalf of kids in West Virginia, great job West Virginia KIDS COUNT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/an-oral-health-win-for-kids-in-west-virginia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAACP challenges barriers to the vote</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/naacp-challenges-barriers-to-the-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/naacp-challenges-barriers-to-the-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Theissen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity and Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disenfranchisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAACP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Civil rights defenders NAACP have released a new report challenging policies they say discourage voting in communities of color. The report, &#8220;<a href="http://naacp.3cdn.net/37b93ce11c8f26ace7_mlbrsyxvb.pdf">Defending Democracy: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America</a>,&#8221; examines the rise of new voter ID laws,&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civil rights defenders NAACP have released a new report challenging policies they say discourage voting in communities of color. The report, &#8220;<a href="http://naacp.3cdn.net/37b93ce11c8f26ace7_mlbrsyxvb.pdf">Defending Democracy: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America</a>,&#8221; examines the rise of new voter ID laws, limits on voting periods, and other restrictions to the franchise that have appeared just as communities of color have been turning out to vote in historic numbers.<br />
<a href="http://naacp.3cdn.net/37b93ce11c8f26ace7_mlbrsyxvb.pdf"><img style="padding: 10px; float: right;" src="http://voices.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/NAACP-report.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Barriers to the vote could disenfranchise as many as five million eligible voters in the 2012 election, according to a Brennan Center for Justice estimate cited in the report.  The NAACP commendably shows how racially disproportionate the impact would be, using the example of voter ID laws: &#8220;&#8230;an astonishing 25% of African Americans (over 6.2 million African-American voters) and 16% of Latinos (over 2.96 million Latino voters) do not possess valid photo ID. By comparison, only 8% of whites are without a current government-issued photo ID.&#8221; In other words, new voting laws are choosing restrictions that correlate with race groups in the hopes of discouraging people of color from voting, the report argues.</p>
<p>Read <a href="http://www.naacp.org/pages/defending-democracy">a summary on the NAACP&#8217;s website</a>, and let us know what you think on our Facebook page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/naacp-challenges-barriers-to-the-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1.2 million American kids gain health coverage through CHIP</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/1-2-million-children-gain-health-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/1-2-million-children-gain-health-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MatthewWright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children’s Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children's Health Insurance Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite the flagging economy, the number of uninsured children in America has decreased by 1.2 million since Congress bolstered the Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program in 2009. And new federal aid to state governments is encouraging them to cover even more&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the flagging economy, the number of uninsured children in America has decreased by 1.2 million since Congress bolstered the Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program in 2009. And new federal aid to state governments is encouraging them to cover even more needy kids through popular public health programs.</p>
<p>Twenty-three U.S. states are sharing $296.5 million for encouraging low-income families to enroll their children in public health programs.  Bonuses announced last week by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reward states that streamline eligibility for Medicaid, the federal-state health program for the poor, or the Children’s Health Insurance Program.  The effort is aimed at children younger than 19 from households with annual incomes of as much as $45,000 for a family of four, though some states have more generous criteria.</p>
<p><span id="more-5555"></span></p>
<p>States which received bonuses include Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, and Virginia.</p>
<p>When you consider the 2.5 million young adults also joining the insurance rolls in recent years, it&#8217;s clear that America has made great gains in coverage for kids. You can read this <a href="http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/2011/CHIPRA/ib.shtml">issue brief</a> from the Department of Health and Human Services to learn how more children are gaining health coverage through these programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/1-2-million-children-gain-health-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The health reform law won&#8217;t increase the deficit</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/the-health-reform-law-wont-increase-the-deficit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/the-health-reform-law-wont-increase-the-deficit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bentley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children’s Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional budget office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[krugman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New York Times economics writer Paul Krugman yesterday took to his blog to make the point, once and for all, that the health reform law derisively called &#8220;Obamacare&#8221; will not increase the national deficit. Krugman seems exasperated with health reform&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times economics writer Paul Krugman yesterday took to his blog to make the point, once and for all, that the health reform law derisively called &#8220;Obamacare&#8221; will not increase the national deficit. Krugman seems exasperated with health reform critics playing fast and loose with the facts, and attempts to settle the argument with data from the Congressional Budget Office.</p>
<p>The nonpartisan CBO is the authority on how much legislation costs, and it would seem to show that health reform is paid for. Krugman goes so far as to show a summary of CBO estimates demonstrating health reform&#8217;s net effect on the deficit. The facts often get lost in the hysterics and grandstanding that big legislation attracts, but a lot of people don&#8217;t know <a href="http://www.voices.org/blog/september-a-big-month-for-child-health/">all the good that health reform has already done for American kids</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/the-health-reform-law-wont-increase-the-deficit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress is looking for smart investments. Tell them: Start with kids!</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/congress-is-looking-for-smart-investments-tell-them-start-with-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/congress-is-looking-for-smart-investments-tell-them-start-with-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rheine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Care & Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daycare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early care and education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incarceration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juvenile justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre-K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-kindergarten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=5331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congress has been consumed with talk of cost-cutting and smart spending. We say pre-kindergarten is a great place to start; it&#8217;s much easier to nurture a child than rehabilitate a young adult. <strong><a href="http://www.voices.org/take-action/americas-kids-americas-future/congress-looking-for-smart-investments-start-with-kids/">And that&#8217;s the topic of our new infographic</a>!</strong><br />&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress has been consumed with talk of cost-cutting and smart spending. We say pre-kindergarten is a great place to start; it&#8217;s much easier to nurture a child than rehabilitate a young adult. <strong><a href="http://www.voices.org/take-action/americas-kids-americas-future/congress-looking-for-smart-investments-start-with-kids/">And that&#8217;s the topic of our new infographic</a>!</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.voices.org/take-action/americas-kids-americas-future/congress-looking-for-smart-investments-start-with-kids/"><img style="padding: 10px; float: right; width: 150px;" src="http://voices.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/homepage_preknow.jpg" alt="Pre-Kindergarten infographic: the cost of pre-k versus incarceration" /></a></p>
<p>There are far too many children in need of rehabilitation in America, with about 1.9 million juveniles arrested yearly. Preventing crime and helping these youth is not only the right thing to do, but stands to save us a lot of money: It costs around $88,000 a year to incarcerate a juvenile.</p>
<p>Pre-K costs only around $4,000 a year, a bargain for the nurturing, socialization and education a child receives. And pre-K has been shown to reduce crime. An often-cited study of Chicago at-risk youth showed that those who got high-quality pre-K were 39 percent less likely to have been incarcerated by age 28. <strong><a href="http://www.voices.org/take-action/americas-kids-americas-future/congress-looking-for-smart-investments-start-with-kids/">Learn more in our infographic</a>!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/congress-is-looking-for-smart-investments-tell-them-start-with-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration to exempt some states from No Child Left Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/obama-administration-to-exempt-some-states-from-no-child-left-behind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/obama-administration-to-exempt-some-states-from-no-child-left-behind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey_Labrack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early Care & Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary and secondary education act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no child left behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=4940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With officials from many states saying they can&#8217;t meet the standards of the federal No Child Left Behind education law, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/us-to-grant-waivers-for-no-child-left-behind/2011/08/05/gIQA52ra1I_story.html">the Obama administration plans to issue waivers</a> excusing them from some of the law&#8217;s requirements. The No Child Left&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With officials from many states saying they can&#8217;t meet the standards of the federal No Child Left Behind education law, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/us-to-grant-waivers-for-no-child-left-behind/2011/08/05/gIQA52ra1I_story.html">the Obama administration plans to issue waivers</a> excusing them from some of the law&#8217;s requirements. The No Child Left Behind law demands that states sharply increase student test results or risk lose federal dollars. </p>
<p>Although the administration has sought reform of No Child Left Behind, these waivers could be an indication that the law won&#8217;t get attention anytime soon. Educators worry that the law as it stands forces them to spend too much time teaching to standardized tests. Only a third of American 4th and 8th graders read at a &#8220;proficient&#8221; level, according to national tests. <a href="http://www.voices.org/issues/early-care-education/the-nations-report-card-on-reading-in-2009/">Learn more in our report on student testing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/obama-administration-to-exempt-some-states-from-no-child-left-behind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Breast Milk Cure</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/the-breast-milk-cure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/the-breast-milk-cure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bentley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children’s Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breastfeeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=4832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Voices was proud to attend the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine&#8217;s 3rd annual summit. Although we were the only children&#8217;s group in attendance, two of our board members were able to give great presentations on this very important topic. Sen. Tom&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voices was proud to attend the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine&#8217;s 3rd annual summit. Although we were the only children&#8217;s group in attendance, two of our board members were able to give great presentations on this very important topic. Sen. Tom Harkin even made an appearance (pictured).<br />
<a href="http://www.bfmed.org/"><img style="padding: 10px; float: right; width: 200px;" src="http://www.voices.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/harkin.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Why is promoting breastfeeding so important? Only about 13 percent of American babies are exclusively breast-fed for six months, as the World Health Organization recommends. Promoting breastfeeding is even more important in the rest of the world, as a recent New York Times article &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/opinion/23kristof.html?_r=2&amp;scp=4&amp;sq=breastfeeding&amp;st=cse">The Breast Milk Cure</a>&#8221; explains. Take some time and learn about the issue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/the-breast-milk-cure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making it easier to get your pre-natal benefits in UT</title>
		<link>http://www.voices.org/blog/making-it-easier-to-get-your-pre-natal-benefits-in-ut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.voices.org/blog/making-it-easier-to-get-your-pre-natal-benefits-in-ut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 19:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rheine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children’s Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voices.org/?p=4606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We shouldn&#8217;t make families jump through a lot of hoops to get their child services &#8212; especially when it comes to pre-natal care. That&#8217;s why Utah and other states have programs offering &#8220;presumptive eligibility,&#8221; a way to streamline the process&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shouldn&#8217;t make families jump through a lot of hoops to get their child services &#8212; especially when it comes to pre-natal care. That&#8217;s why Utah and other states have programs offering &#8220;presumptive eligibility,&#8221; a way to streamline the process so families get the care they need sooner. Pre-natal care in particular is very important:</p>
<p>&#8220;Studies show pretty consistently that every dollar spent on prenatal care yields between $1.70 and $3.38 in savings,&#8221; our own Senior Vice President of Programs Joe Theissen tells <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/51803622-78/care-baby-prenatal-medicaid.html.csp" target="_blank">the Salt Lake Tribune</a>. You can tell your members of Congress not to be short-sighted about child services by <a href="https://secure3.convio.net/voices/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&amp;page=UserAction&amp;id=110327" target="_blank">signing our petition to protect kids</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.voices.org/blog/making-it-easier-to-get-your-pre-natal-benefits-in-ut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

